{"id":20542,"date":"2023-12-13T07:16:46","date_gmt":"2023-12-13T07:16:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/kapirumconsulting.com\/?p=20542"},"modified":"2023-12-13T07:19:24","modified_gmt":"2023-12-13T07:19:24","slug":"the-outsize-impact-of-a-small-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kapirumconsulting.com\/the-outsize-impact-of-a-small-change\/","title":{"rendered":"THE OUTSIZE IMPACT OF A SMALL CHANGE."},"content":{"rendered":"\n
A Lesson from Symphony Orchestras.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cIn the mid-1960s, less than 10% of the musicians in the \u201cbig five\u201d U.S. orchestras (Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago, New York, and Cleveland) were women. In the 1970s and 1980s, as part of a broader diversity initiative, the groups changed their audition procedures to eliminate POTENTIAL BIAS. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Instead of conducting auditions face-to-face, they seated musicians behind a screen or other divider. In a landmark 2000 study, economists Claudia Goldin and Cecilia Rouse found that the screen increased the success rate of female musicians by 160%. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
They attributed roughly a quarter of the orchestras\u2019 increased gender diversity to this simple change. And with selection based more squarely on musical ability, the orchestras were undoubtedly better off.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A Lesson from Symphony Orchestras. \u201cIn the mid-1960s, less than 10% of the musicians in the \u201cbig five\u201d U.S. orchestras (Boston, Philadelphia,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":20543,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[109,110,111,112,113,98],"class_list":["post-20542","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-all","tag-bias","tag-change-2","tag-coaching","tag-diversity","tag-inclusion","tag-leadership"],"yoast_head":"\n